Brian Turner's Business Blog
 
Business, Marketing, Search, Internet, Blogs, Forums, and Tech
February 4, 2008

Google vs Links sales: the worst is yet to come

Aaron Wall posts about a trend that’s opened up to a lot of webmasters over the New Year - falling Adsense revenues.

The chatter has been around for a while, and it seems the recent move to reduce the clickable space in Adsense could well be contributing - but the economic downturn hitting big corporate advertisers is almost certainly a complicating factor as well.

Here’s the problem - SEO offers the most cost-effective ROI on any other marketing method. That’s a fact. It also usually offers a more cost-effective method of monetising as website than Adsense alone.

So if publishers find revenues falling, link sales is going to be an obvious consideration for a number for increasing revenues - especially as affiliate revenue is likely to also be affected.

And if PPC spends are falling due to an economic downturn, then those same big PPC spenders will be looking more to SEO for cost-effective returns - which means link sales.

The danger is of both supply and demand coming together, because it will exacerbate an already tense situation with Google regarding link buying and selling.

I do a lot of work in the financial services sector, and I know most of the high street names already have SEO budgets, and are pushing more on off-page factors. The momentum of slow-moving but massive corporate dinosaurs is already moving this way.

Google has always been a links driven search engine - PageRank was revolutionary because it looked at link relationships between websites and their keyword relationships - as opposed to Alta Vista’s obsession with on-page factors.

Google won - but as the commercial web expanded, and commercial pressures with it, those link relationships can now be bought and sold and faked - for a price.

It’s always been Google’s Achilles Heel, and every time some moron pushes a big public link scheme, or else argues about how it is their right to sell links and Google should allow it, all they are doing is shouting out that Google has this Achilles Heel.

The longer this short-term bravado continues, the more likely this will accelerate Google into finding ways to diminish link relationships in a way useful to SEO’s.

Already they’ve crippled public access to PageRank values, and the introduction of Google Universal continues to muddy the waters on what is actually being achieved with link development.

And we can only expect things to get worse if I’m right about the market supply and market demand for links sees a boost through diminishing revenues for publishers, and diminishing returns for PPC advertisers.

In the meantime, I’m remaining focused on asset development than revenue generation - my hope is that when economic conditions start to move upwards again, it about 2 years time - then by being focused on long-term survival I may just end up with the best revenue strategy of all.

I can only hope my optimism is well-founded, because in the meantime, link developers may have to make an extra special effort to keep their heads down - because the threshold on Google’s radar is getting smaller and smaller.



Related posts to:
"Google vs Links sales: the worst is yet to come":



5 Comments »
  1. Link buying and selling will never go away — it can be driven underground, but Google can never know (for sure) why somebody made a link.

    I think the price of links will go down… I think they’re absurdly high right now. I had two people buy links on one of my sites last year, and between the two of them they paid me 8 years worth of Adsense revenue for the site — and I still get the Adsense.

    Comment by Usagi Tsukino — February 11, 2008 @ 3:24 pm

  2. It amazes me that people in this industry do not understand that Google doesn’t care if you buy or sell links. It only cares if you pass “link juice.”

    I am glad that they are addressing the abuse of their system. It also now forces lazy SEO’s to actually earn their keep.

    Comment by geri — February 13, 2008 @ 6:01 am

  3. While I think it’s great the Google is trying to stop the “cheaters”, we go back to the old catch 22 for new sites. You can’t get natural links until people find your site, but people won’t find your site until you get links. Anyway, I think it’s going to get much harder to get a new site or blog going.

    Comment by John — February 23, 2008 @ 4:23 pm

  4. I agree with Geri, it does seem to be a Catch-22 situation.

    Those with new sites are at an instant disadvantage unless they purchase an older domain with some previous backlinks/value. However, this is well outside the budget of many, so it lends itself to corporate dominated search results in all but the most obscure search terms.

    Comment by Rob — February 27, 2008 @ 3:27 pm

  5. I really hope they find a way to catch all those link buyers, its annoying how many websites with great content rank last but some with paid links are ranking amongst the top

    Comment by Ismail — May 7, 2008 @ 2:32 pm

Leave a comment


Previous: « Microsoft to buy Yahoo
Next: Lessons learned from speaking at SES London »

Visited 1665 times, 3 so far today since July 24th 2007