Google supplemental screw up
So Peter sent me a somewhat frantic e-mail, after noticing the newer Google results have supplemental’ed his forums - and Platinax, too.
Apparently, 3 of the key UK business forums had been hit, so I posted about it.
Google results are pretty appalling in the Longtail - home of the supplemental index - at present.
While researching dropshipping options for an upcoming ecommerce site, I thought to use sauron dropshipping as a search term, for Lord of the Rings products.
Of the current Top 10 results, 6 URLs aren’t even functioning (includes the first 4), 1 is a scraper site, 1 is a parked donain, and only 2 are working - 1 of which is an archived eBay page anyway.
MSN recently boasted they could be more relevant than Google within 6 months. At present, that would hardly be a challenge.
ADDED:
Okay, let’s run a comparison on MSN and Yahoo!
MSN - sauron dropshipping
- 1. Affiliate ID link to eBay
- 2. Poker site
- 3. Dropshipper
- 4. eCommerce site (dropshipper?)
- 5. Scraper site
- 6. Poster affiliate site
- 7. Scraper site
- 8. Poker site
- 9. Scraper site
- 10. Poker site
Well, *only just* better than Google. Handling doorways and redirects better *could* increase relevancy 4 fold.
Yahoo! - sauron dropshipping
- 1. eCommerce site (dropshipper?)
- 2. Sh!te affiliate site
- 3. An irrelevant eBay page
- 4. Another irrelevant eBay page
- 5. Posters site
- 6. Posters site
- 7. Another irrelevant eBay page
- 8. Another irrelevant eBay page
- 9. Another irrelevant eBay page
- 10. Another irrelevant eBay page
Ouch. Those results are pretty poor - maybe related to the new Yahoo! algo update - doesn’t seem to have done anything for relevancy in this longtail.
And now back to Google - sauron dropshipping
- 1. 404
- 2. 404
- 3. 404
- 4. 404
- 5. Dropshipper
- 6. Parked domain
- 7. Scraper site
- 8. 404
- 9. Out-of-date eBay page
- 10. Custom 404: “Item no longer exists”
Looks like Google is so busy trying to bloat it’s index size with out of date URLs. Not helpful for the user.
OVERALL:
MSN wins, by way or ranking a dropshipper 3rd, compared to Google’s 5th. Yahoo! get’s a booby prize - but don’t worry, it redirects to a poker site. ;)
Previous: « Passive information as a marketing tool
Next: Chris Beasley kicked out from Sitepoint »
Visited 385 times, 2 so far today since July 24th 2007



On one side, you have a few dozen major search sites. On the other, you can count millions of site owners / administrators trying to rank higher for several themes.
Since none of these search engine can scan the whole web in a day, it’s obvious some results will vary from what they were supposed to be (the last time the spider crawled the URL).
The example you bring up is a reminder search engines, even MSN, still have some serious work to do!
Comment by Claude Gelinas — March 12, 2006 @ 6:44 pm