Hacking servers for SEO benefits?
It’s the second time it’s happened - I’ve gone to one of my sites, only to find someone has inserted unathorised code linking to another website.
Today it was the turn of a niche investment site I operate, but haven’t updated for a couple of months..
In this instance, the unauthorised code included a link to a Flash file on a property website, as well as Javascript attempting to download a trojan to visitors.
It’s pretty sickening to know that hackers have entered your websites in the first place, let alone using it to distribute malware.
What’s more disturbing is the potential for hacking a site to insert links to third-parties for SEO purposes.
Perhaps the Flash file inserted had a purpose other than plain SEO benefits.
However, it remains a possibility that SEO’s in competitive industries may be employing hackers as a way of adding their own links to third-party sites.
Keep an eye on this for developments in future.
ADDED: Graywolf has the title “Website Hijacking” in his spoof of blackhat SEO terms rendered for corporate speak.
I guess the practice is already established, simply not so discussed in the mainstream.
Related posts to:
"Hacking servers for SEO benefits?":
2 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Previous: « 10 webmaster emails from Hell
Next: Finding large scale duplicate content »
Visited 51050 times, 129 so far today since July 24th 2007

[...] So imagine my surprise when I did a search for the anchor text used in an unauthorised code insert on one of my sites, as reported here: [...]
Pingback by Brian’s Blog » Finding large scale duplicate content — February 2, 2006 @ 12:37 pm
Definitely some solid proof of that now. The currently #1 ranking website in Google.com for “download movies” has hidden links placed through hacking (presumably by a third party - black hat SEO, most likely) on dozens of DNN dotnetnuke sites worldwide. And apparently their scheme has worked too as the download movie site is at or near the top for a variety of highly trafficked searches. The worst problem is that victims never know their affected until they get a notice from Google about upcoming listing removal from SERPs.
Comment by Andrew Jensen — March 1, 2009 @ 12:55 pm